develooper Front page | perl.vmsperl | Postings from October 2002

Re: MMK + 7.3-1 = :-( [was Re: Problem building Perl]

Thread Next
October 4, 2002 12:11
Re: MMK + 7.3-1 = :-( [was Re: Problem building Perl]
Message ID:

Craig Berry writes:

At 1:12 PM -0400 10/4/02, wrote:

!>I have just succeeded in building an unpatched perl 5.8.0
!>using DEC C V6.0-001 on OpenVMS Alpha V7.3-1 with MMK V3.9-3
!>on an ODS-2 volume.
!Interesting.  Is XFC enabled?  Have you installed the DEC AXPVMS
!VMS731_RMS V1.0 ECO?

None that I can find using "search sys$update:vmsinstal.history rms" nor
"pipe product sho product * | sea sys$pipe rms" (suggestions for a better
algorithm are welcome, note that I am not the sys admin).  Around here XFC
a real bad name, I think that we have tried it three or four times and
backed it
out each time.  We will be receiving a field test ECO'ed version of XFC for
installation, perhaps as early as next week, that we will try again with.
Around here mentioning "XFC" is not typically done in polite conversation.

Peter Prymmer

Thread Next Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About