On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 08:33:48PM -0500, Randy W. Sims wrote: > A quickie sample implementation to add more meat. I didn't apply yet > mainly because I'm wondering if we shouldn't bail and do a complete > roll-back (eg. don't generate a Build script) if there are any failed > requirements. Or should we bail, for example, during ./Build test if > there are any test_requires failures? Or continue as is and just let it > fail when it tries to use the missing requirements? Continue. Nothing's more frustrating than a system which refuses to even try to go forward when some checklist is incomplete.