develooper Front page | perl.qa | Postings from March 2005

Re: [Module::Build] Re: Test::META

From:
Michael G Schwern
Date:
March 29, 2005 20:26
Subject:
Re: [Module::Build] Re: Test::META
Message ID:
20050330033439.GC25628@windhund.schwern.org
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 08:33:48PM -0500, Randy W. Sims wrote:
> A quickie sample implementation to add more meat. I didn't apply yet 
> mainly because I'm wondering if we shouldn't bail and do a complete 
> roll-back (eg. don't generate a Build script) if there are any failed 
> requirements. Or should we bail, for example, during ./Build test if 
> there are any test_requires failures? Or continue as is and just let it 
> fail when it tries to use the missing requirements?

Continue.  Nothing's more frustrating than a system which refuses to even
try to go forward when some checklist is incomplete.




nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About