Test::Unit, ::Class, or ::Inline?

I'm taking a software development class this semester which will involve 
writing extensive object-oriented code. My partner and I are trying to 
decide whether to use Test::Unit, ::Class, or ::Inline for our test scripts.

I can see the advantages of Test::Class in terms of object heirarchy, 
but I really like the idea of having my tests right along with the 
methods when using Test::Inline. (The latter would be great when 
presenting our code to the class.)

Thoughts?

-- 
Ian Langworth
Project Guerrilla
Northeastern University
College of Computer and Information Science

• Test::Unit, ::Class, or ::Inline? by Ian Langworth
• Re: Test::Unit, ::Class, or ::Inline? by Michael G Schwern
• Re: Test::Unit, ::Class, or ::Inline? by Adrian Howard
• Re: Test::Unit, ::Class, or ::Inline? by Michael G Schwern
• Re: Test::Unit, ::Class, or ::Inline? by Adrian Howard
• Re: Test::Unit, ::Class, or ::Inline? by Ovid
• Re: Test::Unit, ::Class, or ::Inline? by Michael G Schwern
• Re: Test::Unit, ::Class, or ::Inline? by jason
• Re: Test::Harness::HTML (was Test::Unit, ::Class, or ::Inline?) by Ian Langworth
• Re: Test::Harness::HTML (was Test::Unit, ::Class, or ::Inline?) by Peter Kay
• Re: Test::Unit, ::Class, or ::Inline? by Michael G Schwern
• Re: Test::Unit, ::Class, or ::Inline? by Ovid
• Re: Test::Unit, ::Class, or ::Inline? by Andy Lester
• Proposed Test::Harness::Straps data by Ian Langworth
• Re: Test::Unit, ::Class, or ::Inline? by David Golden
• Re: Test::Unit, ::Class, or ::Inline? by Michael G Schwern
• Re: Test::Unit, ::Class, or ::Inline? by David Golden
• Re: Test::Unit, ::Class, or ::Inline? by Michael G Schwern
• Re: Test::Unit, ::Class, or ::Inline? by Tels
• Re: Test::Unit, ::Class, or ::Inline? by Michael G Schwern
• Re: Test::Unit, ::Class, or ::Inline? by jason