Re: Implementation of documented POD6 behaviour

On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 12:18 PM Richard Hainsworth
<rnhainsworth@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> "In the future..."
>
> with a footnote that it is not implemented.
>
> I am willing to look at the Rakudo code and create a PR to
> implement this functionality. Is there any reason not to do this

I recommend you take into consideration the tremendous energy
being applied to Pod by zagap, the author of Pod6Lite, and align
any Rakunian effort with their effort. (As per the reddit thread I
linked to in my previous reply to you in the file format thread.)

> a POD6 table may not contain a POD6 table.

This is a great example. Regardless of whether zagap does or
does not intend to implement nested tables, simply *discussing*
this issue with them should be very valuable.

--
love, raiph

• Implementation of documented POD6 behaviour by Richard Hainsworth
• Re: Implementation of documented POD6 behaviour by Ralph Mellor
• Re: Implementation of documented POD6 behaviour by Tom Browder