Front page | perl.perl6.users |
Postings from September 2018
Re: Need regex help
September 16, 2018 07:33
Re: Need regex help
Message ID: email@example.com
On 09/15/2018 07:32 PM, Larry Wall wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 06:45:33PM -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> : Hi All,
> : I have been doing a bunch with regex's lately.
> : I just throw them out based on prior experience
> : and they most all work now. I only sometimes have to
> : ask for help. (The look forward () feature
> : is sweet.)
> : Anyway, I have been using regex switches without
> : knowing why. So
> : What is the difference between
> : \N
> That is a character that is not any of the valid \n characters.
> : :\N
> That is not a thing. That is a colon, which causes the previous thing
> to not backtrack (if it would), followed by a \N (see above).
> : <:\N>
> That is not a thing. In fact, it's a syntax error.
> : <<\:N>>
> That also is not a thing. That is a left word boundary <<, followed by
> \:, which matches a quote literally because it's backslashed, followed
> by an N, which also matches literally, followed by the right word
> boundary >>. As a pattern, it is impossible for the combination to match,
> since, while >> can match after a literal N, a << cannot match before a colon.
> : And why would I choose one over the other (what
> : are they called out for)?
> I would never choose any of them, apart from \N. Where are you getting
> this craptastic list from?
Well. I will have to go through my question with a fine
toothed comb and create a keeper tutorial for what I
come up with. And in the process, I will no doubt trip
across a lot of stuff I got wrong.
It may be two weeks before I get back -- I have to finish
my company's federal taxes -- but I will get back with whagt I
come up with.
And to answer your question: I got some of this stuff
some from context (what I have seen), and
Well, the rest of it from, shall we say pulled out of
Into everyone's life a little humiliation must fall.
Thank you for all your help with this.