Front page | perl.perl6.users |
Postings from June 2018
From: Brandon Allbery
June 14, 2018 18:04
Message ID: CAKFCL4WkGn6Efyhrj9faHAEWaz0GMx689Dm5X3rCXHyfk=7TDA@mail.gmail.com
I'm trying to not second-guess whoever maintains the glossary. And by that
message also pointing up the omission.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 2:01 PM The Sidhekin <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 7:57 PM, Brandon Allbery <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> You can never be certain in *any* case. Check if you're not sure what it
>> means. Because sometimes languages use some term in a way you don't expect,
>> whether because they drew it from some specific discipline (Haskell uses a
>> lot of terminilogy from abstract mathematics, for example) or for some
>> reason (I've hit a few cases where the language author didn't know the
>> actual meaning of some term and used it "oddly" as a result).
>> Which doesn't have "pragma" in it, probably because it's not specific to
>> Perl. It's been around, and used in this sense, since at least the 1960s
>> and probably earlier.
> ... but does have "whitespace" and "variable" in it, neither of which is
> specific to Perl. :-P
> Isn't the lack of "pragma" there an omission to be corrected?
> Particularly if the term is required for the reading of error messages?
brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates
unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net