Front page | perl.perl6.users |
Postings from June 2018
From: Brandon Allbery
June 14, 2018 18:01
Message ID: CAKFCL4WabkUb6tCptvNcv+C8vSU3wS+XuWYgbbKhtPxBiPVndw@mail.gmail.com
Not to mention "language designer isn't from your culture, and the word has
different connotations in theirs". The eastern (or for that matter western)
US does not define the world.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 1:57 PM Brandon Allbery <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> You can never be certain in *any* case. Check if you're not sure what it
> means. Because sometimes languages use some term in a way you don't expect,
> whether because they drew it from some specific discipline (Haskell uses a
> lot of terminilogy from abstract mathematics, for example) or for some
> reason (I've hit a few cases where the language author didn't know the
> actual meaning of some term and used it "oddly" as a result).
> Which doesn't have "pragma" in it, probably because it's not specific to
> Perl. It's been around, and used in this sense, since at least the 1960s
> and probably earlier.
> So also check various CS glossaries.
> Such as FOLDOC: http://foldoc.org/pragma
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 1:52 PM ToddAndMargo <ToddAndMargo@zoho.com>
>> On 06/14/2018 10:49 AM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
>> > That's actually the origin of it: pragmatic / real-world behavior, as
>> > opposed to idealized situations.
>> I can't always tell when things are English and when
>> things are Perl.
> brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine
> unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad
brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates
unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net