Front page | perl.perl6.stdlib |
Postings from June 2002
On Monday 17 June 2002 11:49, raptor@unacs.bg wrote: > I think 6PAN should be split in several common SDK with good/thought in > advance hierarcy (+ easy to install non-interactive SDK-install), but the > rest should be free to use... > > So it can be a bare-bone-Perl + several SDK's easy to dload and install.... That idea, as you may know, has come up quite a few times. It's been seen that trying to create a big one-size-fits-all SDK doesn't work (which is not what you're suggesting, I just wanted to get that idea out of the way). Several small, domain-specific SDKs would imho be a good idea indeed. I know that there was talk about doing this amongst the XML community. Imho a good way to get there would be for domain-specific groups (SIGs in fact) to come up with their own SDKs. I don't think they need to be coordinated between themselves as the good ideas will spread quickly. -- Robin Berjon <robin@knowscape.com> -- for hire: http://robin.berjon.com/ Prediction is very difficult, especially of the future. -- Niels BohrThread Previous | Thread Next