develooper Front page | perl.perl6.stdlib | Postings from September 2000

Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Chaim Frenkel
Date:
September 19, 2000 20:17
Subject:
Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules
Message ID:
m37l87u4zj.fsf@csamnycln01.nyc.csam.com
>>>>> "TC" == Tom Christiansen <tchrist@chthon.perl.com> writes:

TC> I would be opposed to any mechanism that could allow people
TC> to have their code without its attendant documentation.

Why? 

What if I have one or two development boxes, and two handfuls of
production machines. I don't need documentation on the production
boxes.

Or what about a application that doesn't want to force the end-user to
install perl?

<chaim>
-- 
Chaim Frenkel					     Nonlinear Knowledge, Inc.
chaimf@pobox.com				               +1-718-236-0183

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About