Front page | perl.perl6.source.control |
Postings from September 2000
Adam Turoff wrote: > > > Feedback welcome. > > I noticed that CVS reports this as part of the version logs: > > date: 2000/09/13 05:49:30; author: cvs; state: Exp; lines: +19 -19 Yup: not sure how to orchestrate logging in to the server as different usernames, or su'ing to be different users. Suggestions welcome. > This sorta means that 'cvs annotate' is kinda useless since this > 'cvs' dude is doing all of the patching. ;-) He's a busy guy ;-). > By comparison, here's what we have in the Perforce logs. Jarkko > and Sarathy do a good job of including the relevant mail headers > in the logs, which are now in Barrie's CVS version. > > [ 7001] By: jhi on 2000/09/01 23:00:13 > [ 7000] By: jhi on 2000/09/01 22:36:01 > [ 6999] By: gsar on 2000/09/01 22:16:40 > [ 6998] By: jhi on 2000/09/01 22:14:16 > > (It would be even nicer to see who actually wrote the patch if a single > patch is being applied with each change, but that sounds like a lot of > work.) I thought that was the purpose of putting the relavent mail headers in there? Or do you mean you want a tool to m// the mail header and add it to the above report (which doesn't look like direct p4 output, is it a perl script cooking the output?). - BarrieThread Previous | Thread Next