Front page | perl.perl6.language |
Postings from March 2009
Re: Logo considerations
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next
From:
Darren Duncan
Date:
March 24, 2009 02:06
Subject:
Re: Logo considerations
Message ID:
49C8A277.6000604@darrenduncan.net
Replying to myself on the quantum thing, as I mentioned an image involving an
transparent overlap of two generally mutually exclusive things (each a very
simple image for the logo's sake) could have all sorts of symbolism. I
mentioned the Junctions meaning already, but I wanted to add that in general it
speaks to the idea of combining things in a package, or particularly to Perl's
TimToady concept, or to that artist's comment about others seeing a block of
wood but that person seeing whatever it would turn into once carved. But yes, I
think that whatever logo we have would be better to have 2 distinct and
overlapping elements than just a single element.
Replying to at least 3 others, can we please go back to keeping the Perl
discussion lists for text only emails, and keep image attachments etc out?
Please just post a url to your image ideas rather than attaching them. Who
needs 200K individual emails when a 3K email and a link works fine.
Thank you. -- Darren Duncan
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next