Front page | perl.perl6.language |
Postings from August 2006
Re: === and array-refs
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next
From:
Dave Whipp
Date:
August 17, 2006 12:47
Subject:
Re: === and array-refs
Message ID:
20060817194653.14394.qmail@lists.develooper.com
David Green wrote:
>
>
> No, look at the example I've been using. Two arrays (1, 2, \@x) and (1,
> 2, \@y) clearly have different (unevaluated) contents. "eqv" only tells
> me whether they have the same value (when @x and @y are evaluated).
> That's a different question -- yes, it's the more common question, but I
> think the comparison I want to make is just as reasonable as ===, except
> there's no easy way to do it.
does "*$a === *$b" work? I.e. splat the two arrays into sequences, and
then do the immuable compare on those sequences.
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next
-
===, =:=, ~~, eq and == revisited (blame ajs!)
by Yuval Kogman
-
Re: ===, =:=, ~~, eq and == revisited (blame ajs!) -- Explained
by Yuval Kogman
-
Re: ===, =:=, ~~, eq and == revisited (blame ajs!) -- Explained
by David Green
-
Re: ===, =:=, ~~, eq and == revisited (blame ajs!) -- Explained
by Larry Wall
-
Re: ===, =:=, ~~, eq and == revisited (blame ajs!) -- Explained
by Smylers
-
Re: ===, =:=, ~~, eq and == revisited (blame ajs!) -- Explained
by Charles Bailey
-
Re: ===, =:=, ~~, eq and == revisited (blame ajs!) -- Explained
by Jonathan Lang
-
Re: ===, =:=, ~~, eq and == revisited (blame ajs!)
by Darren Duncan
-
Re: ===, =:=, ~~, eq and == revisited (blame ajs!)
by Aaron Sherman
-
Re: ===, =:=, ~~, eq and == revisited (blame ajs!)
by Yuval Kogman
-
Re: ===, =:=, ~~, eq and == revisited (blame ajs!)
by Yuval Kogman