How about one of these? ====================== class Baz { has $.a is restricted; has $.b is controlled; has $.c is unique; has $.d is shared; has $.e is queued; has $.f is token; ... } --- John Drago <john.drago@precissystems.com> wrote: > I asked this via the Google Groups interface a few weeks ago, but I'm > not sure if it made it here. > I am asking again in case the question never made it onto the list. > > Has the syntax for synchronized/threaded @things been worked out? > For example: > > class Foo is synchronized { > ... > } > > our method Bar is synchronized { > ... > } > > class Baz { > has $.Bux is synchronized; > } > > ...or is there some new, less Java-esque way to express "only one > thread may access this thing at a time"? > > > > ________________________________________ > John Drago | VP Software Engineering > john.drago@precissystems.com > www.precissystems.com > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.comThread Previous | Thread Next