On 4/26/06, Joe Gottman <jgottman@carolina.rr.com> wrote: > According to Synopsis 5, the repetition qualifier is now **{.} where the . > must correspond to either an Int or a Range. This seems rather restrictive. > Why are we not allowed a junction of Ints, for instance S05 also says: <quote> It is illegal to return a list, so this easy mistake fails: / [foo]**{1,3} / (At least, it fails in the absence of use rx :listquantifier, which is likely to be unimplemented in Perl 6.0.0 anyway). </quote> So it seems only reason not to allow lists is that they aren't yet implemented, and likely won't be for some time. > Also, I don't know exactly what the syntax looks like, but I can imagine > using a repetition qualifier that takes a closure of some sort, for instance > to match an odd number of repetitions > m/^ a**{($_ % 2 == 0)} $/; #I'm not sure about the syntax for the code. Are you reading some old version of S05? http://dev.perl.org/perl6/doc/design/syn/S05.html says that "The repetition specifier is now **{...} for maximal matching, with a corresponding **{...}? for minimal matching. Space is allowed on either side of the asterisks. The curlies are taken to be a closure returning an Int or a Range object. " So you can just put any closure which returns Int or Range directly within the curlies. -- Markus LaireThread Previous | Thread Next