develooper Front page | perl.perl6.language | Postings from September 2005

How 'bout .ortho, .para? [was "Re: Perl 6 Meta Object Protocols and$object.meta.isa(?)"]

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Michele Dondi
Date:
September 5, 2005 07:42
Subject:
How 'bout .ortho, .para? [was "Re: Perl 6 Meta Object Protocols and$object.meta.isa(?)"]
Message ID:
Pine.LNX.4.62.0508311457191.3834@picard.pcteor1.mi.infn.it
(Sorry for replying _so_ late...)

On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Larry Wall wrote:

> I kinda like Autrijus's idea that "meta" just means "guts".  In
> classical Greek, "meta" just means "with".  The fancy philosophical
> meaning of "aboutness" isn't there, but is a backformation from
> terms such as metaphysics.  Metaphysics is just what you study along
> "with" physics.

Well, I have always been told that the bakinformation regards the term 
metaphysics coming from the title of the related book by Aristotle, which 
in fact happened to have that title because it came _next to_ the physics 
one...

More on topic, a pun on other prefixes (especially in the context of 
Chemistry) suggests we may have .para, .ortho, as well? Could we find a 
semantic meaning for them? They may have to do with classes behaving 
parallely (both subclasses of a class higher in hyerarchy?) or othogonally 
(guaranteed to take actions in full independence of the current one) to 
.meta; well, it was just an idea...


Michele
-- 
> i need to know what type of math and how much math a surgeon uses.
How about asking what type of surgery and how much surgery
a mathematician uses?
- Robin Chapman in sci.math

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About