develooper Front page | perl.perl6.language | Postings from July 2005

Re: User-defined infix subs/methods?

Thread Previous | Thread Next
Michele Dondi
July 13, 2005 08:10
Re: User-defined infix subs/methods?
Message ID:
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Larry Wall wrote:

> Good, I'd forgotten about that.  Which means that it's even harder
> for someone to compile a module in a "strange" dialect, since they'd
> essentially have to write their own version of "use" that forces
> recompilation ("reuse", if you will).  And the harder we make it to
> write "reuse", the better.

IIUC this will introduce a certain degree of asymmetry though, in that in 
some sense p6 will be extremely generous in giving users the ability to 
use whatever dialect/syntax modification they like in their programs but 
just at the same time it will try to make it hard for them to do so when 
refactoring code into suitable modules. Ain't it so?

Either of these mechanisms should be available in IE (after 
sacrificing a suitable animal to XP SP2, I suppose).
- Alan J. Flavell in clpmisc, "Re: character encoding in"

Thread Previous | Thread Next Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About