Front page | perl.perl6.language |
Postings from April 2005
Luke Palmer wrote: >>`is pure` would be great to have! For possible auto-memoization of >>likely-to-be-slow subs it can be useful, but it also makes great >>documentation. > It's going in there whether Larry likes it or not[1]. There are so > incredibly many optimizations that you can do on pure functions, it's > not even funny. Haha. Er... How about the one that goes further and also implies that the function is strictly typed throughout; is ML He'd love that, for sure! :) Sam.Thread Previous | Thread Next