develooper Front page | perl.perl6.language | Postings from April 2005

Re: Sun Fortress and Perl 6

Thread Previous | Thread Next
Sam Vilain
April 27, 2005 15:19
Re: Sun Fortress and Perl 6
Message ID:
Luke Palmer wrote:
>>`is pure` would be great to have! For possible auto-memoization of
>>likely-to-be-slow subs it can be useful, but it also makes great
> It's going in there whether Larry likes it or not[1].  There are so
> incredibly many optimizations that you can do on pure functions, it's
> not even funny.  Haha.  Er...

How about the one that goes further and also implies that the function
is strictly typed throughout;

   is ML

He'd love that, for sure!



Thread Previous | Thread Next Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About