On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 12:00:28PM -0500, Aaron Sherman wrote: > > The one obvious thing to POD users is the replacement of <> with [] or > {}. Why is this? Because < and > are used in un-balanced ways in a large > number of situations, so they should not be the primary bracketing > constructs. Actually, I quite like <> as the bracketing characters. They are visually distinctive, they connect well with their adjacent C/X/L/etc without visually merging into it (compare L<foo> with L[foo]), and in the circumstance that you want to bracket an unbalanced bracket, you just double (triple, whatever) up and add some space: C<< $x > $y >> Looks pretty clear to me. --DksThread Previous | Thread Next