"Larry Wall" <larry@wall.org> wrote in message news:20040124014137.GA26838@wall.org... > That is, suppose you have: > > macro leach () { return "»" } > macro reach () { return "«" } > > You could unambiguosly write > > leach+reach > > but (assuming spaces not allowed within distributed operators) you can't > write > > leacheqreach But, presumably, you could write a macro that has a whitespace-eater encoded somehow. That is, macro leach() { chomp_trailing_whitespace; return "»" } macro reach () { chomp_leading_whitespace; return "«" } then the macro magic would expand "leach eq reach" as "»eq«" (which, hopefully, it then re-parses as a single token^Woperator). This doesn't solve the generalized problem of disambiguating, though I could see a "_" operator defined as a macro that eats all its surrounding whitespace. Dave.Thread Previous | Thread Next