develooper Front page | perl.perl6.language | Postings from January 2004

Re: Semantics of vector operations

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
A. Pagaltzis
Date:
January 21, 2004 19:01
Subject:
Re: Semantics of vector operations
Message ID:
20040122030039.GC746@klangraum
Gah. Not a good combination do heavy editing and insufficient
proofreading make.

* A. Pagaltzis <pagaltzis@gmx.de> [2004-01-22 03:55]:
> Good point; however, this means
a
> different way to think of the vector ops than we had so far.
> Basically, we're moving from the realm of vector ops to that of
> vectorized operands.
> 
> In light of this, I think Austin's proposal of marking the
> operands as vectorized makes a lot of sense. It was an
> unexpected
twist
> that had me taken aback for a moment, but I like it more the
> more I think about it. It *feels* right to emphasize
> vectorization as something that happens to an operand, rather
> than something that's a property of the operation.

-- 
Regards,
Aristotle
 
"If you can't laugh at yourself, you don't take life seriously enough."
Thread Previous | Thread Next

nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About