Front page | perl.perl6.language |
Postings from October 2001
RE: NaN semantics
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next
From:
David Whipp
Date:
October 10, 2001 10:22
Subject:
RE: NaN semantics
Message ID:
000001c151b0$05a92670$926464c4@intranet.fastchip.com
> So the imaginary numbers would be standard literals? Like
>
> $x=2+10i;
>
> Great idea, as well as sqrt(-1) returning 1i istead of raising the
> exception. BTW, I was thinking once that numeral literals
> like 4k or 10G
> (meaning 4*2**10, 10*2**30) would be very nice. What do you think?
>
> - RaFaL Pocztarski, admin@rfl.pl
First this thread tells me that "123foo" will be 123 in numeric
context. Now I find myself wondering what "123indigo" evaluates
to!
Dave.
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next