develooper Front page | perl.perl6.language | Postings from October 2001

Re: NaN semantics

Thread Previous | Thread Next
RaFaL Pocztarski
October 10, 2001 09:37
Re: NaN semantics
Message ID:
Trond Michelsen wrote:

> >> BTW, I was thinking once that numeral literals like 4k or 10G
> >> (meaning 4*2**10, 10*2**30) would be very nice. What do you think?
> > I think the meaning of the suffices are sufficiently vague as to make me
> > uncomfortable supporting them. Is 1K 1024 or 1000? I can make a good case
> > for both, and that's never a good sign.
> There's always the possibility of supporting SI's binary prefixes ;)

I thought about it but it wouldn't work with imaginary numbers. :)

- RaFaL Pocztarski,

Thread Previous | Thread Next Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About