develooper Front page | perl.perl6.language | Postings from October 2001

Re: NaN semantics

Thread Previous | Thread Next
Trond Michelsen
October 10, 2001 09:24
Re: NaN semantics
Message ID:
>> BTW, I was thinking once that numeral literals like 4k or 10G
>> (meaning 4*2**10, 10*2**30) would be very nice. What do you think?
> I think the meaning of the suffices are sufficiently vague as to make me 
> uncomfortable supporting them. Is 1K 1024 or 1000? I can make a good case 
> for both, and that's never a good sign.

There's always the possibility of supporting SI's binary prefixes ;)

Trond Michelsen

Thread Previous | Thread Next Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About