develooper Front page | perl.perl6.language | Postings from October 2001

RE: NaN semantics

Thread Previous | Thread Next
Brent Dax
October 9, 2001 08:35
RE: NaN semantics
Message ID:
Jonathan Scott Duff
# On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 10:17:26AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
# > Depending on what Larry's planning, we may weld in support
# for imaginary
# > numbers. While they're mind-warping, in some ways they're
# better than
# > having a line labeled "Beyond here be dragons" or something.
# Neat. It'd be nice to have the "i" syntax as well: 3+2i
# I can hear the crys now though "Oh no! First ``x'', then ``v'', now
# ``_'' and ``i''. Sheesh! When will it end?!?"  ;-)

For consistency, I'd prefer to use is: 3+(2 is i).  Well, either way,
this is a good thing for properties to handle.  GO PROPERTIES!  ;^)

--Brent Dax
Configure pumpking for Perl 6

They *will* pay for what they've done.

Thread Previous | Thread Next Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About