develooper Front page | perl.perl6.language | Postings from October 2001

Re: NaN semantics

Thread Previous | Thread Next
Dan Sugalski
October 9, 2001 07:42
Re: NaN semantics
Message ID:
At 09:33 AM 10/9/2001 -0500, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 10:17:26AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > Depending on what Larry's planning, we may weld in support for imaginary
> > numbers. While they're mind-warping, in some ways they're better than
> > having a line labeled "Beyond here be dragons" or something.
>Neat. It'd be nice to have the "i" syntax as well: 3+2i
>I can hear the crys now though "Oh no! First ``x'', then ``v'', now
>``_'' and ``i''. Sheesh! When will it end?!?"  ;-)

r. When we allow Roman Numerals for constants we're doomed. :)


--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk

Thread Previous | Thread Next Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About