Branden wrote: > > For example, with tgz it would be complex to deal > with running without extracting, What? tar -z not good enough for you? > ... than have too much flexibility and end up with some distribution > problems (like `oh! I don't have bzip2 and the developper only supplied a > bzip2 version of the archive', or `oh! I'll have to do zip, tgz, bzip2, > whatever3 versions of the same thing only to satisfy users that use > different formats'). You way overstate the difficulty of this problem. And you also way overstate the alleged downside of having a flexible solution. -- John PorterThread Previous | Thread Next