develooper Front page | perl.perl6.language.strict | Postings from February 2001

Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN

Peter Scott
February 17, 2001 11:23
Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN
Message ID:
At 02:47 AM 2/17/01 -0500, wrote:
> > >Yes, but like it or not, they have over 10 years of precedent behind
> > >them.  We're used to this situation, the screaming has already been
> > >done, the scabs are healed over.  Let's not pick at them.
> >
> > I've always picked at 'em... in any case, the mandate for Perl 6 design 
> was
> > to consider everything fair game, within user-defined reason.
>Yes, but its questionable which one is "better".  Given a fresh start
>writing a new language, I'd definately say warnings by default.  I'd
>also say arrays should start at one, not zero.  But we've got a large
>and diverse community to deal with.
>This is very much a 6.0 of one, 12.0/2.0 of another type of situation.

Okay, I think we should agree to disagree at this point and back away from 
the keyboards... I've made my best arguments and I hate reruns.  By now 
everyone knows what we both think and they're probably sick of it to boot.
Peter Scott
Pacific Systems Design Technologies Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About