why not just use C /* ... */ ? - nntp.perl.org

Front page | perl.perl6.language.mlc | Postings from August 2000

why not just use C /* ... */ ?

From:

David L. Nicol

Date:

August 22, 2000 12:09

Subject:

why not just use C /* ... */ ?

Message ID:

39A2CE95.B667629@kasey.umkc.edu



I mean, really, why not?

Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? by Tom Christiansen

Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? by Michael Mathews

Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? by Dave Storrs
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? by JVromans

Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? by David L. Nicol
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? by Michael Mathews

Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? by JVromans

Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? by Michael Mathews

Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? by Nick Ing-Simmons
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? by iain truskett

Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? by JVromans

Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? by iain truskett

Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? by Damien Neil

Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? by iain truskett

Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? by Damien Neil

Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? by JVromans

Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? by iain truskett

Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? by Michael Mathews

Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? by Michael Mathews

Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? by Michael Mathews

Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? by Dave Storrs
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? by iain truskett

Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ? by Tom Christiansen

why not just use C /* ... */ ? by David L. Nicol

nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About