Front page | perl.perl6.language.data |
Postings from August 2000
Nathan Torkington wrote: > > Karl Glazebrook writes: > > Yes. And for the record I also think the current approach of lets generate > > ten million RFCs and Uncle Larry knows best is nuts. There are already > > too many RFCs on this topic alone to grasp coherently. > > Do you have a better suggestion? > > Nat subgroups should iron out there differences among themselves and come up with a coherent set of proposals. the final decision should not be in the hands of one person. KarlThread Previous | Thread Next