Re: [perl #18127] [PATCH] Implicit stack direction probe

Dan Sugalski wrote:

> At 9:41 AM +0100 10/30/02, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> 
>> Jason Gloudon wrote:
>>
>>> ... By default both compilers align stack variables at their natural
>>> alignment, so PMC pointers would normally fall on 4 byte boundaries.

>> So, this "someone" are we (parrot itself) + language extensions (PXS) 
>> which have to be compiled with the same compiler options, parrot is 
>> compiled with.
>> Using packed structures with PMCs/Buffers inside is a strict "don't do 
>> that!".
> 
> 
> I'm comfortable with this. 


Patch went in during changes WRT Parrot_destroy - though I'm not sure if 
I did mention it in the description.

leo

• [perl #18127] [PATCH] Implicit stack direction probe by Jason Gloudon
• RE: [perl #18127] [PATCH] Implicit stack direction probe by Garrett Goebel
• Re: [perl #18127] [PATCH] Implicit stack direction probe by Jason Gloudon
• Re: [perl #18127] [PATCH] Implicit stack direction probe by Leopold Toetsch
• Re: [perl #18127] [PATCH] Implicit stack direction probe by Dan Sugalski
• Re: [perl #18127] [PATCH] Implicit stack direction probe by Leopold Toetsch
• Re: [perl #18127] [PATCH] Implicit stack direction probe by Dan Sugalski
• Re: [perl #18127] [PATCH] Implicit stack direction probe by Leopold Toetsch
• Re: [perl #18127] [PATCH] Implicit stack direction probe by Jason Gloudon
• Re: [perl #18127] [PATCH] Implicit stack direction probe by Leopold Toetsch
• Re: [perl #18127] [PATCH] Implicit stack direction probe by Leopold Toetsch
• Re: [perl #18127] [PATCH] Implicit stack direction probe by Dan Sugalski
• Re: [perl #18127] [PATCH] Implicit stack direction probe by Leopold Toetsch
• Re: [perl #18127] [PATCH] Implicit stack direction probe by Dan Sugalski