At 8:40 AM -0800 10/28/02, chromatic wrote: >On Sunday 27 October 2002 23:27, Brent Dax wrote: > >> Appearances are deceiving--the first adds some (unparsed?) source code, >> the second adds information on file and line numbers, probably based on >> offset into the bytecode. > >Similar in terms of implementation, that is. :) Underlying implementation, sure--we'll just be jamming bytes into the appropriate chunks of the segment, potentially in multiple calls. I'm not sure I want to worry too much about that quite yet, though, as I'm still trying to nail down the required functionality. :) -- Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai dan@sidhe.org have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunkThread Previous | Thread Next