develooper Front page | perl.perl6.internals | Postings from August 2002

Re: INP ("imcc's not parrot")

Thread Previous | Thread Next
'John Porter'
August 22, 2002 04:55
Re: INP ("imcc's not parrot")
Message ID:
Dan Sugalski wrote:
> The intent ultimately 
> is that you hand an AST, and potentially some rules, to IMCC and it 
> creates bytecode for you from it.

That's different, then.  Then the whole issue of syntax goes away.
Unless the data interchange format is textual; but even then, you'd
want a syntax highly tuned for tree structures (and other things),
and the current syntax doesn't sound like it fits this criterion.

John Douglas Porter

Thread Previous | Thread Next Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About