'John Porter' wrote: > Brent Dax wrote: > No; but statements like "imcc MUST provide access to ALL of parrot's > (still very dynamic) feature set" and discussions of imcc syntax > naturally lead to questions of imcc's role in the parrot project. > E.g. "will the perl6 compiler target imcc?" The perl6 compiler currently does target imcc. What the final compiler will look like - how knows. > While imcc is cool and worthy, it probably oughtn't be discussed on > this list untless/until it is a "blessed" member of the parrot suite. imcc is a very useful shortcut for writing a HLL. As long a perl6 is using it, discussion should be here (or in a new HL list, but low traffic frequency doesn't make it worth the effort, IMHO) leo