Front page | perl.perl6.internals |
Postings from August 2002
Dan Sugalski <dan@sidhe.org> writes:
> At 8:05 PM +0200 8/21/02, Angel Faus wrote:
> > >
> >> Sure, I have no problem with it. At one
> >> time someone suggested making a separate
> >> list for Parrot compilers, so I took it as
> >> a hint that maybe we were spamming.
> >>
> >
> >I am all for the creation of a new list for stuff such as imcc, and
> >perl6 compilers. (parrot-compilers@perl.org?)
> >
> >So people interested in parrot internals (the hard stuff: GC,
> >JIT,..) don't need to listen our discussions about bugs on imcc,
> >feature requests, etc..
> >
> >On the other hand people like me that cannot keep track of all that
> >happens on perl6-internals, would have an easier way of focusing on
> >areas were we can actually contribute something.
>
> If there's no objection, I'll ask Ask or Robert to set this up.
>
> Everyone's got until, say, Friday noon my time (GMT-500) to object.
Speaking as a summary writer, I'd rather keep track of two lists than
three. But it's not a 'real' objection...
--
Piers
"It is a truth universally acknowledged that a language in
possession of a rich syntax must be in need of a rewrite."
-- Jane Austen?
Thread Previous