At 07:00 PM 8/21/2002 -0400, 'John Porter' wrote: >No; but statements like "imcc MUST provide access to ALL of parrot's >(still very dynamic) feature set" and discussions of imcc syntax >naturally lead to questions of imcc's role in the parrot project. >E.g. "will the perl6 compiler target imcc?" Good question. The problem is, there is no one but us to answer that question. Or who are we waiting for? >While imcc is cool and worthy, it probably oughtn't be discussed on >this list untless/until it is a "blessed" member of the parrot suite. It is currently part of the prototype perl6 compiler. We should discuss it here unless we are going to move _all_ compiler discussion to another list (which I am ok with if that is the consensus). For now, I'd hoped we could keep it all on one list, until it becomes a problem. -MelvinThread Previous | Thread Next