At 8:05 PM +0200 8/21/02, Angel Faus wrote: > > >> Sure, I have no problem with it. At one >> time someone suggested making a separate >> list for Parrot compilers, so I took it as >> a hint that maybe we were spamming. >> > >I am all for the creation of a new list for stuff such as imcc, and perl6 >compilers. (parrot-compilers@perl.org?) > >So people interested in parrot internals (the hard stuff: GC, JIT,..) don't >need to listen our discussions about bugs on imcc, feature requests, etc.. > >On the other hand people like me that cannot keep track of all that happens on >perl6-internals, would have an easier way of focusing on areas were we can >actually contribute something. If there's no objection, I'll ask Ask or Robert to set this up. Everyone's got until, say, Friday noon my time (GMT-500) to object. -- Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai dan@sidhe.org have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk