Re: [perl #15340] [PATCH] Boolean PMC

At 07:45 PM 7/22/2002 -0400, Melvin Smith wrote:
>At 05:47 PM 7/22/2002 +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
>I think boolean is a language dependant thing and probably shouldn't
>be implemented as a PMC. For some languages, boolean can be optimized
>all the way down to the JIT level, and I'm not sure which languages would
>actually want to use it as a PMC.

Err let me rephrase that:

Language "Foo" may need a Boolean PMC, and if it does, implementing
it is fine. I just don't feel it belongs as a "core" PMC.

-Melvin

• [perl #15340] [PATCH] Boolean PMC by Alberto Manuel "Brandão" "Simões"
• Re: [perl #15340] [PATCH] Boolean PMC by Nicholas Clark
• Re: [perl #15340] [PATCH] Boolean PMC by Melvin Smith
• Re: [perl #15340] [PATCH] Boolean PMC by Melvin Smith
• Re: [perl #15340] [PATCH] Boolean PMC by Scott Walters
• Re: [perl #15340] [PATCH] Boolean PMC by Simon Glover