On Sat, 20 Jul 2002, Brent Dax wrote: > educated_foo@cvs.perl.org: > # test: > # - for t in t/compiler/*.t; do perl -I../../lib $$t; done > # + for t in t/*/*.t; do perl -I../../lib $$t; done > > May I suggest that, at least in the long term, we avoid unportable shell > scripts and such? This sort of thing makes it quite difficult to port > to other OSes (like Windows) and wins nothing over a standard test > harness. Patches welcome :). I don't have a Windows machine, so I'm likely to miss things like this (you'll need to "cvs update" to get a ".exe" tacked onto "parrot" in the test module as well). /sThread Previous