Front page | perl.perl6.internals |
Postings from July 2002
Ashley Winters:
# 1. Why is test_main.c not named main.c?
Because parrot.exe was originally named test_prog.exe, so at the time it
made sense for it to be called test_main.c.
# 2. What does having a Parrot_ prefix signify, considering
# both the opcodes and
# the embed api use it? It's hard to distinguish between them.
It signifies one of the following:
-This function is externally visible.
-This function belongs to Parrot at large, and not any particular
subsystem (e.g. Parrot_sprintf and friends).
-This function has an identical name to a C library function because it
emulates it for certain platforms (e.g. Parrot_dlopen (?)).
-This function is autogenerated, so we're going to be paranoid about
naming conflicts.
For functions in the last category, I'd suggest we use
subsystem-specific names, e.g. Op_ for the opcodes.
# 3. What source files implement what docs?
It's a mess.
# 4. Where can I find out what embed.c is doing?
Try looking in my brain. :^) I'll see what I can do about documenting
it more thoroughly.
# 5. Why is parrot.c empty?
It was originally supposed to serve the role of test_main.c, but that
didn't ever happen for some reason. Ask Simon if you really want to
know.
--Brent Dax <brentdax@cpan.org>
@roles=map {"Parrot $_"} qw(embedding regexen Configure)
He who fights and runs away wasted valuable running time with the
fighting.
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next