Front page | perl.perl6.internals |
Postings from February 2001
RE: require < 6.x
From:
NeonEdge
Date:
February 21, 2001 14:42
Subject:
RE: require < 6.x
Message ID:
PBEMJLBGPPJDBCLAMIDFOEMICBAA.wizard@neonedge.com
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 02:05:19PM -0500, Stephen P. Potter wrote:
> If they're going to have to go in and add a "require <6" already, its easier
> to just modify the #! line (and less coding for us).
Duh, <<smacks forehead>> the #! line. I'm awake now, though. ;)
Grant M.
I've gotta stop getting up before noon.
-
Re: require < 6.x
by Brent Dax
-
PDD 2, vtables
by Dan Sugalski
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by David Mitchell
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by David Mitchell
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by David Mitchell
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by David Mitchell
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by Branden
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by David Mitchell
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by David Mitchell
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by David Mitchell
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by David Mitchell
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by Dan Sugalski
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by Simon Cozens
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by Dan Sugalski
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by Edwin Steiner
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by Dan Sugalski
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by Tim Bunce
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by Branden