develooper Front page | perl.perl6.internals | Postings from February 2001

Re: require < 6.x

From:
Simon Cozens
Date:
February 21, 2001 11:14
Subject:
Re: require < 6.x
Message ID:
20010221191415.A17283@pembro26.pmb.ox.ac.uk
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 02:05:19PM -0500, Stephen P. Potter wrote:
> Lightning flashed, thunder crashed and "NeonEdge" <wizard@neonedge.com> whisper
> ed:
> | This is probably way too late, but does this make any sense: could p6 allow
> | (for the first few versions anyway) a "require <6;" directive?
> 
> Do you understand how the current "require #;" works?  It already pretty
> much does what you want.  If you try to do something like
> 
>      perl5.6.0 -e 'require 6;'

I think what he wants is a corresponding "no 6". :)

-- 
In related wibbling, I can see an opening for the four lusers of the
Apocalypse... "I didn't change anything", "My e-mail doesn't work",
"I can't print" and "Is the network broken?".
	- Paul Mc Auley

nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About