Front page | perl.perl6.internals |
Postings from February 2001
Re: PDD 2, vtables
From:
Simon Cozens
Date:
February 9, 2001 02:07
Subject:
Re: PDD 2, vtables
Message ID:
20010209100645.A8961@pembro26.pmb.ox.ac.uk
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 09:55:17PM -0600, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> > Umm, one way or another I suspect UTF-8 will be in there.
>
> I suspect so too but very grudgingly.
If we abstract the string handling nicely, it can be added on later or even
separately. (Credo: We don't have to write all of Perl 6 at once.) Yes, UTF8
is a bit of a pig to deal with, but since most of the world's data is still
7-bit, it's almost certainly worth it.
--
Britain has football hooligans, Germany has neo-Nazis, and France has farmers.
-The Times
-
Re: require < 6.x
by Brent Dax
-
PDD 2, vtables
by Dan Sugalski
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by David Mitchell
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by Branden
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by David Mitchell
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by David Mitchell
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by David Mitchell
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by David Mitchell
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by David Mitchell
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by David Mitchell
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by David Mitchell
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by Dan Sugalski
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by Simon Cozens
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by Dan Sugalski
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by Edwin Steiner
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by Dan Sugalski
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by Tim Bunce
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by Branden