Front page | perl.perl6.internals |
Postings from February 2001
Re: PDD 2, vtables
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next
From:
Dan Sugalski
Date:
February 6, 2001 07:22
Subject:
Re: PDD 2, vtables
Message ID:
5.0.2.1.0.20010206101018.01aa7668@24.8.96.48
At 11:32 AM 2/6/2001 -0200, Branden wrote:
>Simon Cozens wrote:
> > > > =item logical_or
> > > > =item logical_and
> > > > =item logical_not
> > >
> > > Er, why not just use get_bool?
> >
> > Overloading.
> >
>
>Please see my previous post on the subject. As I pointed there, implementing
>|| and && like that breaks short-circuits.
No, it doesn't. Just because you pass in two PMCs doesn't mean that they
both need to be evaluated. Though the PDD does need to be clearer about how
that happens.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
dan@sidhe.org have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next
-
PDD 2, vtables
by Dan Sugalski
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by David Mitchell
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by Branden
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by David Mitchell
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by David Mitchell
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by David Mitchell
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by David Mitchell
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by David Mitchell
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by David Mitchell
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by David Mitchell
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by Dan Sugalski
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by Simon Cozens
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by Dan Sugalski
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by Edwin Steiner
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by Dan Sugalski
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by Tim Bunce
-
Re: PDD 2, vtables
by Branden
-
Re: require < 6.x
by Brent Dax