On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 02:02:13PM +0100, Paul "LeoNerd" Evans wrote: > Over the years there's been a couple of suggestions of features that > people want adding to POD, that have gone back and forth and fizzled > out mostly on the observation that it isn't really clear who would be > responsible for updating/adding code to the various POD formatters or > other consumers. I'd like to get to the bottom of this sometime, as I > feel there's a steadily-growing list of "things that would be nice" > that we don't have in POD. > > I don't want to turn this thread into a discussion on the features > themselves, but rather to work out *who* are the people to really get > into that chat. I would like to be in a position where we can > confidently go about adding some new features and abilities to the > format where currently it is lacking. > > Can anyone suggest who some important stake-holders or otherwise > interested parties might be? Or at least, where we might find out? The pod-people: https://lists.perl.org/list/pod-people.html There was some discussion of the image proposal there: https://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.pod-people/2020/10/msg2110.html The list has generally been very quiet. TonyThread Previous | Thread Next