(resent to list) > On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 2:24â¯PM Oodler 577 via perl5-porters < > perl5-porters@perl.org> wrote: > >> Wow. Darren's email was not an invitation for this garbage. Some >> of you really can't help yourselves. I replied because I was named >> directly; Will is not on this list (for good reason!); neither >> Christian nor "Oshin" POC Ovid had ANY right to participate in >> this part of the thread resulting from Darren's email. >> > > I'm not sure what authority you think you have to refuse the right of > anyone to participate in a p5p mailing list thread. > > >> Your attempt to spread FUD also will not work. People can see that >> there are thousands and thousands of lines of implementation code >> and tests in RPerl that we are extracting from RPerl as its own >> module. But it's being falsely called vaporware and being mischaracterized >> as having zero lines of code? You are an envious LIAR! >> > > This is rather missing the point of his criticism of the merits, which you > decided to make personal here. This isn't high school, we are trying to > discuss the best ideas for Perl not who are the popular kids. > > -Dan >