Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from September 2022
On Fri, 16 Sep 2022 17:55:36 -0700 Darren Duncan <darren@darrenduncan.net> wrote: > I feel the simplest solution is just alter the original RFC to be > builtin::load($package_name) etc rather than unqualified "load". > That seems the most appropriate and simplest way to do this. This is > the kind of thing that builtin:: is for. Oh, I hadn't quite picked up or commented on that subtlety. The original RFC was mostly written before the "builtin" mechanism was finalised. I think in everyone's head who was looking at the original writing, we all imagined it would be in `builtin::` - I've just been assuming that while reading it and hadn't actually noticed. If it isn't explicitly spelled out in words, then yes it ought to be so. builtin::load($module); or use builtin 'load'; load($module); -- Paul "LeoNerd" Evans leonerd@leonerd.org.uk | https://metacpan.org/author/PEVANS http://www.leonerd.org.uk/ | https://www.tindie.com/stores/leonerd/Thread Previous | Thread Next