develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from August 2022

Re: the RFC process is a pain

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Ricardo Signes
Date:
August 15, 2022 20:09
Subject:
Re: the RFC process is a pain
Message ID:
8e41119a-ba83-4ca0-ae69-198367803ba4@beta.fastmail.com
On Fri, Aug 5, 2022, at 17:05, Ricardo Signes wrote:
> You can look at the process document in its branch <https://github.com/rjbs/RFCs/blob/process-v2/docs/process.md>, or you can look at it in the PR that I filed <https://github.com/Perl/RFCs/pull/24>.

I've made a number of fairly small changes based on feedback, and added some more commentary on there, but the short version is: I think it's pretty much okay, and should do a better job of helping us limit the number of vaguely-in-process stuff.  I think it should also make clearer who should be "doing stuff".

I also, more importantly, did the next hunk of work I said I'd do:  I made a new copy of the proposal tracker <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1hVOS7ePuLbVkYcf5S-e_eAodj4izm9Cj7AVs25HvngI/edit#gid=2054807862> with a "New Status" column, mapping what state I think things should be in.  Most things are now rejected or "not tracked", meaning they would not have become tracked documents yet.  Only eight documents are currently live, and next I'd like to make clear who we think is on the hook to do what.  I expect one or two should become expired and that the PSC needs to take clear action in a few other cases.

Before I do that, this is a chance for folks to say "something is quite wrong there."

-- 
rjbs
Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About