On Fri, Jul 15, 2022, at 18:06, Ricardo Signes wrote: > Okay, so. I have been putting off writing more about what we might do, because mostly it all seems like a pain. I have put this proposal into a branch, with modest but non-trivial changes. You can look at the process document in its branch <https://github.com/rjbs/RFCs/blob/process-v2/docs/process.md>, or you can look at it in the PR that I filed <https://github.com/Perl/RFCs/pull/24>. I would like to get the required acceptance of this to justify my time in going through the existing RFC tracker and matching things up to new statuses. Then we can very clearly state who ought to be moving things forward, which I hope will be helpful. Thumbs up required from: - [ ] BooK - [ ] LeoNerd Thumbs up from Nicholas, author of v1, would also be nice. I will certainly consider strong arguments against… -- rjbsThread Previous | Thread Next