Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from July 2022
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022, at 18:45, Tomasz Konojacki wrote: > On Fri, 15 Jul 2022 18:06:58 -0400 "Ricardo Signes" <perl.p5p@rjbs.manxome.org> wrote: > > I really think that part of the process should be more formal. The most > obvious way is to have PSC decide whether a given proposal should be > made into an RFC or not. Another option would be some kind of voting. But > that sounds complicated. Or maybe a specified minimum number of +1 > replies? I don't know. What I want to do is avoid "the PSC must follow the thread closely to know when to say *now is the time, OP! Strike!*" What about: "After you've seen the response you get, and you think you've engaged as much as is useful with any response, post that you'd like the PSC to greenlight a formal proposal." This creates an unambiguous trigger event for PSC to do something, and the something is clear: * say "yes please do" * say "no, you have more work to do, which is X" -- rjbsThread Previous | Thread Next