Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from July 2022
Karl Williamson <public@khwilliamson.com> wrote:
: From reading that discussion, I think you would be more comfortable
:with something like this:
:
: while (s < e) {
: if (! next_uvchr(s, e, &ret_cp, &ret_len)) {
: ... process error ...
: }
: else {
: ... process code_point ...
: }
:
: s += ret_len;
: }
That certainly feels like a cleaner design to me, by avoiding the
overloading of ret_len to have multiple meanings.
:I would consider this. I designed the original proposal to be more of a
:drop-in replacement for the current one. But this one gets rid of the
:flag to say you want errors, and might be close enough to drop-in. I
:await more people to weigh-in.
Thanks for considering it.
Hugo
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next